GLEN ARNOLD INVESTMENTS
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Books
    • My Books
    • Other Books
  • Blog
  • Portfolio
    • Buffett-style
    • Modified price earnings ratio
    • Net Current Asset Value
  • Resources
    • glossary of investment terms >
      • A - B
      • C
      • D - E
      • F - G
      • H - I - J - K
      • L - M - N
      • O - P
      • Q - R
      • S
      • T - U - V - W - Y - Z
    • TOP 10 TIPS FOR INVESTORS

Archive

Newsletter 11 - french connection - deciding whether to invest back then 28th october 2014

22/7/2020

0 Comments

 
Before I post on whether FC (LSE:FCCN) is a good investment now, I’ll go over the line of logic I was following in July 2013.  I mused on the following ideas:

"Don’t forget that Graham did not mechanically purchase all NCAV shares. He also examined for business prospects, stability and quality of management.

Here we are on shaky ground with FC because we really do not know, we can only think probabilistically
Picture

​But then, with this investment category we are not doing a Warren Buffett & Charlie Munger ‘Inevitable’ analysis in which we expect excellent management, economic franchise with a deep and dangerous moat and fantastic stability in every case.


Graham thought that high NCAV firms might turnaround because of one of the following:

  1. Earning power would be lifted to the point where it was commensurate with the company’s asset level. This could come about in two ways: (a) a general improvement in the industry, e.g. entry and exit dynamics mean that low industry profitability is frequently not as persistent as many market pessimists believe, (b) a change in the company’s operating policies – management running a company with such a low share price relative to assets either respond voluntarily to take corrective action or they (or their replacements) are forced to by shareholders, such as adopting more efficient methods or abandonment of unprofitable lines.
  2. A sale or merger with another corporation that could employ the firm’s assets
    would take place.
    It would pay at least the liquidation value.
  3. Complete or partial liquidation could release value.​

In the case of FC I cannot see clearly the most likely reviving factor. I can say that exit from the industry by rivals is very unlikely to be valuable because there is also so much industry entry to keep pressure up.

Liquidation will not release value because everything will be taken by the landlords.

The main hope is a change in the quality of management. Are they now properly awake? Is the new talent really good? We will not know for some time – we can only play the odds."
​
UPDATE (OCT 2014): New management seem to be improving matters.
In the next blog I provide the data which contributed to the decision to invest in 2013.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archive

    I have been writting newsletters for almost 7 years now. Here you can find old newsletters in full. I have discussed previous investment decisions, basics of value investing and the strategies of legendary investors.

    Archives

    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

In the short-run, the market is a voting machine – reflecting a voter-registration test that requires only money, not intelligence or emotional stability – but in the long-run, the market is a weighing machine.  Benjamin Graham




  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Books
    • My Books
    • Other Books
  • Blog
  • Portfolio
    • Buffett-style
    • Modified price earnings ratio
    • Net Current Asset Value
  • Resources
    • glossary of investment terms >
      • A - B
      • C
      • D - E
      • F - G
      • H - I - J - K
      • L - M - N
      • O - P
      • Q - R
      • S
      • T - U - V - W - Y - Z
    • TOP 10 TIPS FOR INVESTORS